Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 3rd Aug 2007 15:46 UTC, submitted by Flatline
Thread beginning with comment 260661
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: OS X, not a good server/cluster OS
by snozzberry on Fri 3rd Aug 2007 16:59
in reply to "RE[2]: OS X, not a good server/cluster OS"
how Apple handles the Java port. I understand the "frozen configuration" methodology, but there is no good reason not to allow modern Java ports on OS X
Unlike other OSes, Java on OS X includes bindings to OS-specific frameworks. These bindings change between OSes: Apple just dropped Cocoa bindings which would be problematic for legacy 10.3 applications that used them.
Apple's mantra is that problems are usually proportional to the number of configurations, so I can see why they don't backport Java to 10.3.
Is it inconvenient and irritating at times? Yes.
RE[3]: OS X, not a good server/cluster OS
by kaiwai on Fri 3rd Aug 2007 17:29
in reply to "RE[2]: OS X, not a good server/cluster OS"
My primary complaint regarding not being able to upgrade isn't about iNquiry, but how Apple handles the Java port. I understand the "frozen configuration" methodology, but there is no good reason not to allow modern Java ports on OS X <= 10.3 on a system they sold as being "enterprise class".
With Java being opensourced, what that should mean is an opensourced built and maintained version which allow you to remain with your chosen version of MacOS X without losing out on updates and security fixes.
RE[4]: OS X, not a good server/cluster OS
by Jondice on Fri 3rd Aug 2007 17:40
in reply to "RE[3]: OS X, not a good server/cluster OS"
Should, but we will see if that happens. I agree it is a good thing and the potential is there, but is the demand? While my problem is irritating and (as has been admitted) would not likely happen had another unix system been chosen, I simply don't think there is the demand there for it. Also, unless things have changed, I believe Apple's patches to Java are still closed, so there would likely be quite a lot of work involved.







Member since:
2006-09-20
My primary complaint regarding not being able to upgrade isn't about iNquiry, but how Apple handles the Java port. I understand the "frozen configuration" methodology, but there is no good reason not to allow modern Java ports on OS X <= 10.3 on a system they sold as being "enterprise class".
Edit: I look forward to wiping the whole system and putting Linux on it, and hopefully transitioning iNquiry over to a much larger Linux x86_64 cluster sometime next year.
Edited 2007-08-03 16:50