Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 12th Aug 2007 20:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 262856
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You're not missing anything. QNX is a proprietary OS with proprietary development tools. That's not necessarily a bad thing, especially for the embedded market. But it's impossible to support a community this way. Not when there's other alternatives like MINIX or Haiku that allow community participation.
Not all operating systems are meant to be developed into desktop platforms. QNX had surprising promise as a desktop, but there was a lot more money to be made elsewhere. In the x86 server market, desktop presence leads to valuable mindshare. But in the embedded real-time market, the desktop is virtually irrelevant.






Member since:
2007-08-12
It would not cost QSS a dime. Just post a nice download link to a free-for-non-commercial use version of QNX, exclude the development tools, but include the incredible PhotonUI.
Wouldn't that mean that the open source community would be unable to code for QNX, unless individuals bought a license for the dev tools? I think I'm missing something.