Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Aug 2007 13:16 UTC, submitted by steverez1
Thread beginning with comment 265584
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: i dont see the advantage over normal web
by google_ninja on Fri 24th Aug 2007 19:16
in reply to "i dont see the advantage over normal web"
While this could be done with flash and AJAX, it would be a much bigger pain to write. This isn't a "pushing the technology to the limit" kind of thing, more just a practical application.
There are two things that are impressive with silverlight. The first is performance in user interfaces. While flash UIs are possible, I have yet to try one that is not sluggish and unresponsive. Secondly, you have access to the entire .net API, which isn't even comparable to something like actionscript.
RE[2]: i dont see the advantage over normal web
by jayson.knight on Sat 25th Aug 2007 07:50
in reply to "RE: i dont see the advantage over normal web"
RE: i dont see the advantage over normal web
by sappyvcv on Sat 25th Aug 2007 13:02
in reply to "i dont see the advantage over normal web"
RE[2]: i dont see the advantage over normal web
by segedunum on Sat 25th Aug 2007 16:02
in reply to "RE: i dont see the advantage over normal web"







Member since:
2007-04-29
while i'm glad it worked smoothly on my ppc mac, i have to say it looks not that good. everything it shows can be easily done with html and ajax. i was really hoping for a flash beater, but this does not look like that.
if this is a showcase of the technical capabilities, i'm really disappointed. ok, only the drag and drop stuff might be hard to do in html. unless it was really easy to code, writing webpages with ajax and all kinds of dynamic stuff really sucks.
anyone interested in stuff like this also should take a look at flex, which is from adobe, flash based, and well, prettier.