Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2007 00:20 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 266374
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: No need to cirumvent GPLv3
by Hiev on Wed 29th Aug 2007 00:55
in reply to "No need to cirumvent GPLv3"
RE[2]: No need to cirumvent GPLv3
by Kishe on Wed 29th Aug 2007 07:25
in reply to "RE: No need to cirumvent GPLv3"
Problem for FSF is, GPLv2 still works great for the needs of the majority of software houses...There simply isn't any practical reason to pick GPLv3 over GPLv2.
Most people who keeps their code under GPLv2 doesn't really care who uses their code as long as they're given back the "tit for tat"






Member since:
2006-01-11
Linux is still licensed GPLv2 and none of the currently GPLv3 licensed software is used on tivo like devices.