Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2007 00:16 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 266664
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-02
You are confusing EULA (end-user license agreements) with copyright licenses.
The first is a license to *use* the software, which may not be enforceable in *most* countries - in fact, Microsoft and others have gone out of their way *not* to bring any case involving EULAs to court, on fears that EULAs might be declared null and void altogether.
The second concerns *redistribution* of the software. You do not in fact have to read or agree with the GPL to use the software. You must, however, agree with the GPL (and abide by it) if you redistribute the software, or you will be in violation of copyright law.
Considering that the GPL is an *extension* of rights usually granted by copyright law, making it null and void would only restrict you further, and not give you any additional rights.