Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 8th Sep 2007 20:18 UTC, submitted by koki
Thread beginning with comment 269849
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Relased under NonCommercial-NoDerivs license?
by KugelKurt on Sun 9th Sep 2007 11:19
in reply to "RE: Relased under NonCommercial-NoDerivs license?"
RE[3]: Relased under NonCommercial-NoDerivs license?
by slight on Sun 9th Sep 2007 12:30
in reply to "RE[2]: Relased under NonCommercial-NoDerivs license?"
Haiku 1.0 is just planned, so what's your point? You seem to have a real axe to grind against GenesTation, mabe you should tell us why? OK it's closed source, but so is lots of code that people use to make OSS software. It may not be appropriate to be the main IDE for Haiku, because it can't be bundled, but that doesn't stop it being useful to people who want to use it.





Member since:
2005-10-17
It's not "the" IDE for Haiku, but "an" IDE for Haiku. Subtle but significant difference.
Hopefully there will be more than one IDE for Haiku in the future, and users will then be able to choose the one they prefer or like better.