To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"You can do whatever the hell you want with the code - you just can't commercially exploit it."
What's exactly to "commercially exploit it"? Can you set up a business with 100 workstations running QNX without their permission? I don't think so. What sets Free Sofware apart from other licensing models is that you can effectively avoid vendor lock-in. I couldn't find their exact licensing terms in their website, but it seem to be designed to keep vendor lock-in as a business model. Hence, it's fundamentally different from Free Sofware as defined by FSF, which is by far the most widely accepted definition, and calling it the same is arguably misleading. "free for personal use" would be acceptable, but in any case it's a VERY different licensing model.






Member since:
2005-06-29
So, again, it's NOT Free Sofware, it's NOT Open Source (maybe the caps help to clarify?) and if you disagree, just Google it. You seem to have been deceived by their announcement, just like they planned.
You can do whatever the hell you want with the code - you just can't commercially exploit it.
It is not Free Software as defined by the FSF. It's not open source software as defined by OSI. But, it it can still be called open source by another defintion - namely that of being able to do whatever the hell you want with it, except sell it.
Like I said before, OSI and FSF haven't patented the definition of open source.