Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Sep 2007 21:36 UTC, submitted by dylansmrjones
Thread beginning with comment 271470
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-02
You are spewing bullshit based on your own flawed bias.
Fact is - and this has been acknowledged openly - that lawyers actually do use Groklaw. Not to get legal advice, (which I have never claimed btw), but because of the analysis of the SCO-cases.
They are using her analyses very much. Also in education. Of course she's not authoritative. She's not the Court after all. But her methodology is being copied and her analyses are also being dissected. Not that it is particularly original (apart from being a first timer for using the internet to rally behind a case like that).
Groklaw is a news site about the SCO-cases. AND a blog about FLOSS in general. And so what? OSNews are tenfold worse. Take a look at CNN. Or whatever media you can find. I guarantee that none of the mainstream media are half as independent as Groklaw is.