Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd Sep 2007 13:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 273717
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As someone already pointed out previously on this thread, had it happened to any other Linux distro on the planet and the reviewer would be bashing it to death, with a large following agreeing with his conclusions. Ubuntu managed to break THE best thing about Debian - not for the first time, I shall mention - but people still will go out of their way to praise it...
Different strokes for different folks, indeed.
Sorry, I could't go any further with this than when you say that an upgrade install screwing up your system is "not a bad thing".
That's a terrible attitude.
That's a terrible attitude.
It was too much trouble to read through the comments, wasn't it? Like I said earlier: "You misunderstood me. I am not saying the messed up upgrade is good - I'm saying that the fact that I can now do a fresh install is good. That is something completely different. A fresh install is much better from a reviewer's perspective, as it creates a much more objective environment."
A fresh install is much better from a reviewer's perspective, as it creates a much more objective environment.
Totally valid, if you'd review, like, Windows. But with a Linux distro one should expect a working update/upgrade path, since this is one of the major features of a Linux distro. I would never use a Linux distro which doesn't have a working upgrade path, and I don't care if it's under development. They started from Debian, they should keep learning from it.




Member since:
2005-07-06
Sorry, I could't go any further with this than when you say that an upgrade install screwing up your system is "not a bad thing".
That's a terrible attitude.
Would it be said about a Windows upgrade install screwing up the existing setup being "not a bad thing"? No, it wouldn't and isn't.
Terrible...