Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 7th Oct 2007 23:01 UTC
Mac OS X Developers have received from Apple a 'ZFS on Mac OS X Preview 1.1' package, which offers preliminary support for the ZFS file system, originally developed by Sun Microsystems for their Solaris OS. Currently, the Mac OS is based on the HFS+ file system, but leaked screenshots of earlier versions of Leopard showed options for formatting hard drives for ZFS. Reportedly, this preview allows full read and write capabilities with the latest developer build of Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, Apple's upcoming version of its OS X operating system.
Thread beginning with comment 277011
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: RAM
by tyrione on Mon 8th Oct 2007 21:20 UTC in reply to "RAM"
tyrione
Member since:
2005-11-21

So you need a processor released in the past 18 months, with even a barebones box that has DDR2 667/800 4Gb/8Gb RAM option [Corsair ValueSelect 2Gig kits are dirt cheap], and I'll leave the rest up to you.

Go to Newegg and build a box. If you spend more than $500 you've added extras unnecessary to meet even these offhand minimum requirements.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: RAM
by Wrawrat on Tue 9th Oct 2007 00:32 in reply to "RE: RAM"
Wrawrat Member since:
2005-06-30

Perhaps it's just me, but I have a problem with building a brand new box for running a goddamn filesystem. I have always favoured security and data integrity over performance. Still, if you need these specs for getting decent performance, what are you going to need to run services on it?

I expect additional overhead from modern software and I understand their focus on new hardware. It doesn't prohibit optimisations, though. It does spoil my plans from getting a Solaris server with ZFS and Zones on an older box (Athlon XP 2500+ with 768 Mb RAM).

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: RAM
by sbergman27 on Tue 9th Oct 2007 03:13 in reply to "RE[2]: RAM"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

"""
Perhaps it's just me, but I have a problem with building a brand new box for running a goddamn filesystem.
"""

To be honest, I can't help but suspect that these people saying you need a 64 bit processor and multi-gigabytes of ram to get decent performance with ZFS are full of it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: RAM
by tyrione on Tue 9th Oct 2007 06:08 in reply to "RE[2]: RAM"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21
RE[3]: RAM
by FunkyELF on Thu 11th Oct 2007 12:05 in reply to "RE[2]: RAM"
FunkyELF Member since:
2006-07-26

Perhaps it's just me, but I have a problem with building a brand new box for running a goddamn filesystem.

Exactly. Traditionally my fileservers have been built out of my older machines.
The problem is....even my newest machine (P4 3.0GHz w/ HT) isn't 64 bit.
Something is wrong if the fastest computer in your house is a fileserver.

Reply Parent Score: 1