To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It is true that businesses competitors make all kinds of seemingly strange agreements. But, this is not what I'm talking about. This appears to be going against the groundwork they may be trying to lay for another strategic maneuver.
My point was that this seems contrary to their current business plan, which appears to be creating uncertainty among Linux customers. Have they changed their mind about Linux and patents? Based on this move, it would seem so.
I think you missed my point.
Edited 2007-10-24 23:49
Business is business, do you really think Red Hat or SuSE is going to be very concerned when the CEO's are making millions off selling 'free' software and providing support?
In the end it plays out like this:
1. CEO's make millions
2. Lawyers make millions
3. Shareholders make millions
4. Businesses pay out $$$
5. End user (is forgotten).....






Member since:
2005-07-06
"In that case, it seems odd to me that MS would support them. It's like MS is validating RH by supporting their product."
Business is business. As a corporation, you simply cannot afford to hold "personal" grudges against companies, especially for things that remain unproven. Plus if it means a Windows license sale, MS will support whatever makes them money. It's not rocket science.