Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 26th Oct 2007 05:34 UTC, submitted by WillM
Thread beginning with comment 281737
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Nice piece of commercial cr*p
by ari-free on Tue 30th Oct 2007 13:27
in reply to "RE[4]: Nice piece of commercial cr*p"




Member since:
2006-01-06
Look at it this way: Who is going to pay for Linux ads? Look, the original poster was correct. You're looking for dirty tricks when, in fact, unbridled over-optimism is the enemy here. People mistakenly thought that growth in the Linux market was coming at the expense of Microsoft; however, in fact, what's happened here is exactly what the article says: Shops running expensive proprietary Unix versions moved to lower-cost Linux distros. When this migration started to dry up, Linux adoption was bound to suffer.
The vast majority of organizations deploying Linux are commercial in nature and obtain their OS preinstalled when they purchase hardware; in addition, those same organizations are getting support contracts at the same time. This is reality. So, in fact while not perfect, hardware deployments track closely to OS market share. You may not like that, but it's true.
IT people don't need to take *anyone's* word for it. They know their own needs. Those needs are reflected in these latest sales statistics -- and they show that Linux deployments have reached a saturation point. The only way for them to continue growing is to move into markets which are currently dominated by Windows (CRM, etc).