To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Before Linux Kernel 2.6 FreeBSD outperformed Linux in nearly all aspects.
That's incorrect. Linux 2.4 was far more scalable than FreeBSD 4 (which has a single lock), and was also faster at many single-thread operations (although slower at some too).
I don't suppose you really have any data to back up this claim anyway.
2.6 brought big speed improvements. I've also heard they got these speed improvements from a FreeBSD kernel hacker who switched to Linux..whether that's true or not I don't know.
Whoever you heard that from is either an idiot or a liar. Even if a dozen FreeBSD kernel developers had been working on Linux 2.5 full time (which there weren't, I don't think there was a single one), then they still couldn't have contributed all the improvements in 2.6.




Member since:
2007-04-30
Before Linux Kernel 2.6 FreeBSD outperformed Linux in nearly all aspects. 2.6 brought big speed improvements. I've also heard they got these speed improvements from a FreeBSD kernel hacker who switched to Linux..whether that's true or not I don't know.