Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Nov 2007 22:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 283597
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
//It just seems to me (and a lot of other people that have been following this for a long time) that application development (and subsequently, distros) on Linux are just trying to replicate the MS, Apple, Adobe, and other major software paradigms out there//
Maybe because that's the better way to do it? I imagine you still use punch-cards for programming. Welcome to 2007.




Member since:
2006-05-30
I think that's what's doing a lot of damage to Linux in general, is all these people that want a zero-cost OS
I concur with this comment. In fact, this kind of mentality is what's driving alot of the application development we see on Linux these days - applications that go against the generally accepted "UNIX philosoph(y|ies)" that have been in place since the creation of UNIX. I could make a huge list, but the major offenders are things like GUI-only applications, bloated do-everything apps, and captive user interfaces. This is precisely the crap most of us *nix-users hate about Windows, OSX, and others. It just seems to me (and a lot of other people that have been following this for a long time) that application development (and subsequently, distros) on Linux are just trying to replicate the MS, Apple, Adobe, and other major software paradigms out there. Not only are they following (or often poorly imitating) instead of leading in this type of software, but cumulatively, they've resulted in these end user experiences that are functionally no different than using Vista or OSX.
If I really wanted to change my system and application settings by navigating huge, unmapped trees of dialog boxes, or waste all my clock cycles animating menus and rendering drop shadows, then I would just stick with Windows.