Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 19th Nov 2007 21:22 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 285444
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Most Windows users couldn't care less about Linux or about bolstering Windows, they just want their stuff to work
Yep. Many of them will pay for subscription to an anti-virus vendor, to keep their systems working. Some of them will call Windows help to try to get their system back to working, and spend hours frustrated because they can't get it sorted that way.
Some people are savvy and smart, and can keep a Windows system clean and going well indefinitely. Good luck to them.
Most people are lumbered with having to take their machines back to the shop every so often in order to keep them working.




Member since:
2005-08-11
"Linux has a longish list of important advantages and cost savings and "lack of hassle" time savings for the users over Windows ... yet Windows users seem to be in denial about that, and seem desperate to try to put down Linux and bolster Windows ... and one has to ask to what end? "
I got a couple of problems with this statement:
1. I don't think there is any "lack of hassle" with Linux. The hassles are different, but they are there. I use both, and have never really noticed a big difference in tinkering time between Windows XP and Linux. Luckily, problems with either are the exception, not the norm.
2. Most Windows users couldn't care less about Linux or about bolstering Windows, they just want their stuff to work, so they can get back to downloading porn.