Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 24th Nov 2007 23:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 286709
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Which is exactly why Gnome has to be involved in the specification of OOXML.
What specification of OOXML? Since it's a woeful dump of Microsoft's existing Office features, what makes you think anyone will have any bearing on it at all?
If OOXML reaches critical mass, and it very well may eventually, then Linux office apps will more or less have to be able to handle files coming from it. If nobody pushes the standard to the point at which it's more easily implementable by the free desktop...
OOXML, as implemented by Office 2007, is already live and out there. There will be no changes made to it. It's not worthy of anyone's time or promotion.




Member since:
2006-03-20
Which is exactly why Gnome has to be involved in the specification of OOXML.
If OOXML reaches critical mass, and it very well may eventually, then Linux office apps will more or less have to be able to handle files coming from it. If nobody pushes the standard to the point at which it's more easily implementable by the free desktop, then we've got a problem on our hands.
Really, the two-proged approach is the way to go:
1) Try to prevent OOXML from taking over. Promote free, and truly open, document standards and try to make them win.
2) Make sure that if OOXML does succeed then it's possible to implement it without too much guess and check.