Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 2nd Dec 2007 22:44 UTC, submitted by Moochman
Thread beginning with comment 288261
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: fedora to be the First?
by Shade on Tue 4th Dec 2007 13:37
in reply to "RE[3]: fedora to be the First? "
"Four months might not be enough to 4.1, but may be enough for 4.0.1.
- Gilboa"
I'd be shocked if a 4.0.1 didn't fall out of the pipe sooner than that. With the broad testing that 4.0.0 will get I'm sure things will come up, probably leading to a snapish 4.0.1. My e-wisdom says four months might actually be more like a 4.0.2... 
RE[5]: fedora to be the First?
by gilboa on Tue 4th Dec 2007 14:10
in reply to "RE[4]: fedora to be the First? "
People seems to forget that much like KDE4, KDE3 was a work-in-progress release and was a far cry from today's ultra-stable-and-feature complete KDE 3.5.8.
Just compare RedHat 7.3 (w/3.0) to F8 and you'll see what I mean.
Granted, it took 3 years to get from KDE 3 (mid 2002) to KDE 3.5 (end of 2005) but in the end, KDE4 will get there.
- Gilboa






Member since:
2005-07-06
Four months might not be enough to 4.1, but may be enough for 4.0.1.
- Gilboa