Linked by David Adams on Tue 4th Dec 2007 19:39 UTC, submitted by michuk
Thread beginning with comment 288498
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Linux is never going to be as big as Mac OS X or Windows XP/Vista on the Desktop because of the lack of commercial support of CRITICAL applications."
Year its not like they have a browser and an ISO standard Office suite...hey! lol
Interestingly the trend is GNU is growing faster both.
I guess you are forgetting about Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard.
Leopard kicks Vista's ass and any Linux distribution too.
Leopard kicks Vista's ass and any Linux distribution too. Linux works on more hardware than either Vista or Mac.
Linux is never going to be as big as Mac OS X or Windows XP/Vista on the Desktop because of the lack of commercial support of CRITICAL applications.
Name some ... there will be a Linux equivalent. The Linux equivalent will quite often be more functional and cheaper ... but just not as well known through not being advertised.
We are also starting to see Linux versions of more and more commercial applications these days. Soon, if a company such as Adobe or AutoCAD has not ported an application, they will find themselves left behind.
The article is about Vista vs Ubuntu not Mac Leopard vs Ubuntu, lets not get carried away. It's too early to predict the future of Linux, Linux is gaining market share. I use Ubuntu at work and Mac Leopard at home, but love the compiz effects on my Ubuntu box. Linux is not only for geeks but also for people who appreciate beauty. Linux is beauty with brains.






Member since:
2007-05-03
I guess you are forgetting about Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard.
Leopard kicks Vista's ass and any Linux distribution too.
Linux is never going to be as big as Mac OS X or Windows XP/Vista on the Desktop because of the lack of commercial support of CRITICAL applications.
Edited 2007-12-04 22:43