To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Neither of those are healthy solutions. I think the best thing to do is offer a link in the shell (Most likely how Windows Live Services are tied into Welcome Center in Windows Vista) which allows the user to download the browser of his choice.
Still I see this as a cold day in hell though. Browser wars are fought by a very niche group of people, my grandmother doesn't care what the hell she's running so-long as the web page displays really pretty.
Do you really think unbundling IE will do anything other than cause grief? Those who don't want IE have already moved on to other means, the Web browser market isn't as cut throat as say the PC Market or the PMP Market.
I mean, there are legitimate arguments here. IE *should* be forced to adopt open standards, even if along side their own proprietary standards. However, unbundling IE from Windows is in my opinion a silly idea, and would give no real benefit to any competitor.
"Browser wars are fought by a very niche group of people, my grandmother doesn't care what the hell she's running so-long as the web page displays really pretty."
This is exactly the attitude that Opera's challenging. By sitting on their market share and refusing to properly implement web standards _that they agreed to_, MS costs companies and web development teams millions of dollars in extra testing, development and support.
This is a war that every company with a web presence should be fighting.







Member since:
2007-01-03
You're freaking kidding me right? Did you even *READ* the article?
Look, lifted straight from the article: Opera requests the Commission to implement two remedies to Microsoft’s abusive actions. First, it requests the Commission to obligate Microsoft to unbundle Internet Explorer from Windows and/or carry alternative browsers pre-installed on the desktop.