Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 12th Dec 2007 05:56 UTC
Benchmarks A lot was said lately about the Vorbis/Theora vs h.264/AAC situation on the draft of the HTML5. As some of you know, video is my main hobby these days (I care not about operating systems anymore), so I have gain some experience on the field lately, and at the same time this has made me more demanding about video quality. Read on for a head to head test: OGG Theora/Vorbis vs MP4 h.264/AAC. Yup, with videos. And pictures.
Thread beginning with comment 291296
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Quality vs Filesize.
by Brunis on Sun 16th Dec 2007 15:21 UTC
Brunis
Member since:
2005-11-01

I know we techies care alot about quality and filesize.. and if we get better quality from one codec over another and end up having the same filesize (h264 > theora in this case). There really is no question which one we'd go with. But regular web site users don't give a damn about quality. Look at how famous sites like break.com or youtube have become. I have never seen 1 quality encoded video on any of those (and still i stay, because what's the alternative?). My point is. I think w3 is doing the right thing trying to set a baseline SHOULD support for a media codec. With the poor <object>/png/css/you-name-it support coming out of Redmond, there won't be any guarentee's we'll be better off in the future, even if the Theora support was to be a MUST for html5. The browser should still be media agnostic and let players/addons/extensions/plugins (user chosen) decide who get's to play it.

Reply Score: 1