Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 21st Dec 2007 21:31 UTC, submitted by GhePeU
Red Hat Matthew Szulik writes: "After almost a decade of leading Red Hat, I have decided to transition my CEO and President role for the personal reasons I have already discussed. It's my privilege to continue serving this great company in the role of Chairman of the Board. Red Hat will be in the capable hands of a world-class executive team under the leadership of Jim Whitehurst as President and CEO."
Thread beginning with comment 292777
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Great man
by ThawkTH on Fri 21st Dec 2007 23:43 UTC in reply to "RE: Great man"
ThawkTH
Member since:
2005-07-06

Wow. Just wow.

"409 Scams from Nigerian young criminals" - there goes ALL your credibility.

CentOS being buggy? Wow. Compared to what?

RedHat is a business. Novell is a Business. Businesses cannot, by their nature, care about ANYTHING but profit. Learn this and suddenly they make a LOT more sense.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Great man
by zombie process on Sat 22nd Dec 2007 04:41 in reply to "RE[2]: Great man"
zombie process Member since:
2005-07-08

These two posts make a hell of a lot more sense when you can, you know, ACTUALLY SEE what they're replying to. If there's going to be a less than -5 option to vote posts down to, there needs to be a "this post is too stupid to bother reading" placeholder for the missing post. It's way too damn confusing trying to read these conversations otherwise.

Edited 2007-12-22 04:42

Reply Parent Score: 8

RE[4]: Great man
by broken_symlink on Sat 22nd Dec 2007 12:32 in reply to "RE[3]: Great man"
broken_symlink Member since:
2005-07-06

you could just change your score threshold. its in preferences.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Great man
by Luminair on Sun 23rd Dec 2007 10:18 in reply to "RE[3]: Great man"
Luminair Member since:
2007-03-30

With the newer site you can click the dropdown icon to expand the collapsed post: http://www4.osnews.com/comments/19077

Reply Parent Score: 2