Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 26th Dec 2007 09:50 UTC
Gnome There is a controversy in the Linux world. It doesn't have to do with Microsoft, or anything overtly technical. It may seem, to the outsider, the open source equivalent of the question, "Boxers or briefs?" But it's much more serious than that. More here.
Thread beginning with comment 293332
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: KDE not stable API?
by elsewhere on Thu 27th Dec 2007 07:37 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: KDE not stable API?"
elsewhere
Member since:
2005-07-13

It can be good to use the GPL for single libraries like described here: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html


The point of the Lesser GPL license is to provide a compromise for certain applications or libraries that don't otherwise offer a compelling enough advantage over non-free/non-GPL alternatives. It is discouraged by the FSF unless otherwise necessary.

Gtk relies on LGPL for acceptance because the very implication is that basically nobody would pay a license fee to use it. Qt can utilize the GPL (as well as a variety of other recognized OSS licenses) because if offers enough value that Trolltech still earns millions in license fees for commercial usage. That simple fact speaks volumes.

Reply Parent Score: 4