To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
One need not look any further than the comments under this story about KDE 4.0.0. Just scanning the first 8 comments I can't help but notice these:
http://www.osnews.com/permalink?295321
http://www.osnews.com/permalink?295331
It's amusing, however, to see others now backpedaling on the claims. KDE4 is just another major restructuring of a popular DE. No more and no less. The claims are now migrating from 4.0, which people are beginning to realize is not really a walk-on-water release... to 4.1. I expect to be equally unimpressed then.
I'll take compatibility with popular real world file formats, codecs, and web sites (many of the sites my customers need in in their business are still IE only) over desktop pizazz any day. The "miracles" which the KDE devs have performed have little to no relevance to my users.
One need not look any further than the comments under this story about KDE 4.0.0. Just scanning the first 8 comments I can't help but notice these
Comments on OSNews != developers, but people still feel that something significant is happening regardless. Go figure.
The claims are now migrating from 4.0, which people are beginning to realize is not really a walk-on-water release... to 4.1. I expect to be equally unimpressed then.
You can smell the palpable fear in the air..... ;-) The opposite of love is indifference. Go read up on how open source projects are developed as well, because this has been explained umpteen times. What are you going say when .5 or .6 is released, because this isn't really going to be all that far away?
I'll take compatibility with popular real world file formats, codecs, and web sites (many of the sites my customers need in in their business are still IE only) over desktop pizazz any day.
You might want to ask how those 'real world' file formats, codecs and IE-only web sites got there in the first place. If that's all that's propping up the software that you're using then, well, I would be worried.
The "miracles" which the KDE devs have performed have little to no relevance to my users.
It's not worth getting heated about then, is it? Reverse psychology ;-).
Go away then, because certainly between five and ten years from now, and quite probably less, if you're not using KDE on your Linux/Unix systems then you're going to be way behind.
Edited 2008-01-12 08:50 UTC







Member since:
2006-01-12
I doubt you'll find many posts that heralded KDE *4.0* as the second coming. Instead people were almost certainly talking about KDE4 if only for the fact that it's shorter to type.
Nevertheless this is not splitting hairs. Anyone who went through the KDE 1->2 rewrite or Gnome 1->2 or OSX, or most incarnations of Windows should know that there's a big difference between the first release and the possibilities the new architecture opens up in the future.
In fact as the vast majority of KDE4 articles up to about 3 months ago talked about the architecture instead of the apps even you could have realized that noone promised world peace and cookies for the 4.0 launch party. =P