To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That's all fine and dandy, but they did that through OEM contracts. Fact is, they still sell their Operating System, almost exclusively, tied with hardware - just like I said previously. :-)
BTW, mentioning their decoupling, strengthens my position, because MS abuses their monopoly position to keep alternatives off of the machines of those very same OEMs (admittedly, that position has weakened ever so slightly in the last few years).
As far as I can tell, the only way to take on a company like that is through lobbying oversight bodies (governments). If you really wanted to take them on in the private sector, Apple's model seems to be the only way to go. If you can't get OEMs to use your alternative product, you'd have to be your own OEM (and I don't mean to say you need to be as locked down as Apple often is, that's all them).
Why worry about hardware in the coming age of Transparent Paravirtualization? http://www.vmware.com/interfaces/paravirtualization.html





Member since:
2006-09-01
I don't think it's stupid, but they'd need to do some things right. First, they'd have to tie it to hardware (Operating Systems are sold with hardware - almost exclusively - why don't business people get that?)
Second, they'd need to have good marketing to sell that hardware - and a good suite of programs (this is essentially what Apple has been doing).
If it were me, I'd try to figure out how to target gamers, but BeOS isn't really ready for that.