To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
They have SCO OpenServer. Which is pretty outdated, but has a certain following among business accounting and point of sale ISVs. Unixware is not quite so outdated, but I can't say much about it because I am less familiar with it. It's what System V Release 4 became.
If I were one of the ISV's dependent upon OpenServer, I think I would have jumped ship long before now. But I've spoken with reps of a couple of them... *technical representatives*... and they seemed pretty dense. Tried to tell me that they needed SCO for their customers because it was easy to use, whereas RedHat was difficult and cryptic. You know how you can be having a conversation with someone and they suddenly say something so bizarre that you look around to make sure that you have a clear shot at the exit and carefully back away? That's just what I did.
I haven't kept up. But it would not surprise me if some of these companies have retained their faith in SCO even to this day, despite all the evidence which should have sent any sane company runnning for cover.




Member since:
2006-01-16
Before people get to negative, SCO dose have two versions of UNIX, some other productsand a customer base and I'm sure there are enough people working there (just not the ones leading the company the last few years) that know that selling a product to customers is good way to make money.
Besides, the article sounds a bit like SCO is going to get coped up and sold of in portions. Either way, there is still some money to be made for the vultures.
Edited 2008-02-15 01:15 UTC