Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Feb 2008 00:11 UTC, submitted by irbis
Xfce "Although I have some doubts that XFCE is 'so very much lighter' than GNOME (GNOME 2.20 doesn't take too much memory if you don't start all kind of crap), it is still lighter, and in a few years there will be less and less antiquated computers who require extra-light window managers (Fluxbox, Openbox, Blackbox, WindowMaker, IceWM). XFCE is reasonably mature, and constantly improving, so it has all the chances to become the mid-weighted Desktop Environment of choice pretty soon! What is XFCE needing to reach the Nirvana? Here's the way I see things."
Thread beginning with comment 301677
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by merkoth
by dagw on Wed 20th Feb 2008 15:57 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by merkoth"
dagw
Member since:
2005-07-06

I don't need an extra layer between the code and the hardware!


I currently earn my money coding largely in python, so I obviously don't share your opinion here.

Should I want Java... er... I already have Java, I don't need .NET/Mono!


Just because you don't need it doesn't make it bad. I am far from an MS fan but I have to admit, without having actually used it too much, that their whole CLR/.NET stuff looks pretty neat from a technical standpoint.

But why can't them be changed *at least* on Debian or Fedora or wherever the package maintainer can choose to filter a little the crap?!


At a guess possibly because most people aren't bothered by it at all. I've heard a lot of different critisisms of mono, and have to admit this is a new one. It hadn't even crossed my mind.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2