Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Feb 2008 20:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 301803
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I completely agree that some, many would probably be the more appropriate word, would consider the MacPro the better option. However, he wasn't arguing that it wasn't. Rather, he was making the point that it isn't the cheapest. We can speculate all day as to how much someone's time is worth making a custom build. But the article was very misleading insinuating that the bill from Apple would be less than the one from NewEgg.
I just tested this myself, and the MacPro was $900 more for the same setup (Same as the article with dual 3G Quads). And that was while being very conservative with the memory and hard drive.




Member since:
2008-01-29
You don't get it do you... Some people thinks this solution is a lot better. On top, they have other things to do than spend hours building hardware and configuring the software. Don't try to enforce a PC on a happy Mac user.
Oh, and what's up with people complaining about the news. I don't read much other than osnews, and I found it interesting. If you don't like it, just don't read it and at least don't post unconstructive comments.
Edited 2008-02-21 00:53 UTC