Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Feb 2008 20:59 UTC, submitted by Oliver
Thread beginning with comment 302672
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Binary system/package capabilities...
by Oliver on Thu 28th Feb 2008 00:55
in reply to "RE[2]: Binary system/package capabilities..."
Just add the applications via pkg_add, you don't have to compile it again and again. Servers tend to be not bleeding edge.
Furthermore using things like ccache helps a lot if you have to compile *something* from source (bug, security etc.). So nothing to worry about, there are a lot of big companies which are using FreeBSD (Yahoo etc.) and they do not whine all day long. Because they _know_ how to use FreeBSD!
RE[4]: Binary system/package capabilities...
by dagw on Thu 28th Feb 2008 09:10
in reply to "RE[3]: Binary system/package capabilities..."




Member since:
2005-07-06
*BSD and gentoo people keep trying to claim that compling from source on the machine that will run the binary is somehow 'better', yet I've never seen any solid argument as to why this should be so.
Compiling from source takes a lot of CPU cycles and memory. Doing so on a heavyly loaded server is generally a bad idea. Being able to update your server without having to crunch away for hours is probably something you want.