Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Feb 2008 15:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 303086
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And then ask either of the typical laptop owners what a "crossover cable" even is.
Doesn't matter. All they will see is that the ends of the cable have plugs that look like they should fit into those sockets on their computers. That's the way end users think. I've spent hours trying to track down strange problems at client sites... only to discover in the end that the customer had added a "hub" to their network. A "hub" which which was actually a router... with DHCP server fully functional and enabled. End users go by what things look like and whether the plug fits.
It would be more interesting, I think, to give them a straight through cable and watch them struggle. Smile! You're on Candid Camera! :-)
Edited 2008-03-03 21:40 UTC






Member since:
2005-07-06
I think Thom's point was simply that wired connections are still much more common than wireless - and that the lack of built-in ethernet will be an inconvenience for users in many situations.
In my personal experience, I've also found wireless networking to be less reliable and, often, much more hassle to get working. For a simple thought experiment, imagine a random sample of 2 typical laptop owners and stick them in a room with their laptops and a crossover ethernet cable. Then ask them to try to connect their laptops to one another via an ad-hoc wireless network, and then do the same using the x-over cable.