Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 6th Mar 2008 16:21 UTC, submitted by SReilly
Thread beginning with comment 303748
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-24
And about as relevant to our daily lives. In the beginning, the SCO thing was supposed to be about Linux. It never was, really. SCO's PR campaign made it sound like it was going to be, of course. But it turned out to be a contractual dispute, and has been only that for a very long time now.
I suspect that if Groklaw weren't still stirring the pot so hard, we'd see very few news reports about this case. It's really not very interesting news at this point. Even if SCO somehow miraculously won something, which is highly unlikely, it would have no real practical impact on Linux.
I think that we continue to watch the SCO cases for much the same reason as we watch the horror films; We want to see it when the monster's head gets chopped of with an ax and goes flying into the lake, as the body stagers and falls to the ground, and then sinks in like it was quicksand.
Now, what would be *really* cool is if IBM, Novell, or the SEC came up with a good reason for a court to pierce the corporate veil and go straight after Darl, Chris and the others personally.