Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd Mar 2008 22:58 UTC, submitted by Julien Danjou
Thread beginning with comment 306367
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
it has all of the feature-lightness of dwm,
If you compare features you'll see that Awesome adds features missing in dwm. Basically if you liked dwm, but wished it wasn't quite as feature light as it is then you should probably take a look at Awesome.
What do the guys at suckless think about the fork?
At a guess that it is a huge pile of bloat (I mean adding features...really) written by a complete nood
RE[2]: don't see the point
by MamiyaOtaru on Mon 24th Mar 2008 19:08
in reply to "RE: don't see the point"




Member since:
2007-07-10
it has all of the feature-lightness of dwm, with none of the guaranteed code-lightness and accompanying (entertaining) arrogance. What do the guys at suckless think about the fork?