Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd Mar 2008 10:22 UTC, submitted by jeanmarc

Thread beginning with comment 306388
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Apart form the French (and a few other anti-Anglo's), the world is moving in that direction; embrace it or be left behind.
And what world is that? I ask because I doubt the Chinese and the Japanese, just to name a couple of countries, would agree with your assertion, nor would they want to have to comply with it.
"Apart form the French (and a few other anti-Anglo's), the world is moving in that direction; embrace it or be left behind.
And what world is that? I ask because I doubt the Chinese and the Japanese, just to name a couple of countries, would agree with your assertion, nor would they want to have to comply with it. "
The Japanese are a special situation - "we're not Asian, we're Japanese!"
Regarding Chinese and Korean, all outside evidence shows that you either learn English and become rich or be ignorant and remain in a rice paddy. Most people are bright enough to work out the better route. Take Singapore for example - they faced reality and it is seen as the economic miracle.
Pragmatic approaches, not cultural masturbation, delivers results. I can assure you that if Mandarin suddenly become the dominant language, I would learn it, just as if Korean were to become the dominant language.
Edited 2008-03-24 03:17 UTC
Even so, a lot of people I know just standardise to English[/]q
Most non-techies prefer their native language.
[q]for non-English speakers, its a lot more expressive.
Most non-techies prefer their native language.
[q]for non-English speakers, its a lot more expressive.
More expressive than what? Their native language? That's bullshit.
embrace it or be left behind.
Hilarious. If anything the world will be moving to chinese in the future.
"Even so, a lot of people I know just standardise to English[/]q
Most non-techies prefer their native language.
[q]for non-English speakers, its a lot more expressive.
Most non-techies prefer their native language.
[q]for non-English speakers, its a lot more expressive.
More expressive than what? Their native language? That's bullshit. "
May I suggest you hear what a language sounds like when it is directly translated - it sounds like baby English. The lack of variation in words becomes so annoying for some they start using Engish words dropped into conversations.
"embrace it or be left behind.
Hilarious. If anything the world will be moving to chinese in the future. "
Or we see Chinese start to enter the English language - take New Zealand English, it is now a fusion of Maori and English; English in itself only has 25% of words of English origin. English is ultimately a bastardised language of fusion. Whilst the French tried the Microsoft approach of 'control freak', English has developed like the opensource world - an orgy of innovation at the grass roots.
Member since:
2005-07-06
Even so, a lot of people I know just standardise to English - at the end of the day is the international language, its flexible, and for non-English speakers, its a lot more expressive. Apart form the French (and a few other anti-Anglo's), the world is moving in that direction; embrace it or be left behind.