Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Apr 2008 21:38 UTC, submitted by SReilly
Thread beginning with comment 309025
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I know this is pretty much flamebait...
Maybe Microsoft is so fast because they have had tons of practice over the last 10 years, and probably have HUGE divisions devoted to the analysis, development, testing, and deployment of patches.
:)
Maybe Microsoft is so fast because they have had tons of practice over the last 10 years, and probably have HUGE divisions devoted to the analysis, development, testing, and deployment of patches.
:)
It actually sounds like a good thing to me.
RE: Lots of practice :)
by PlatformAgnostic on Fri 11th Apr 2008 04:00
in reply to "Lots of practice :)"
I know this is pretty much flamebait...
Maybe Microsoft is so fast because they have had tons of practice over the last 10 years, and probably have HUGE divisions devoted to the analysis, development, testing, and deployment of patches.
:)
Maybe Microsoft is so fast because they have had tons of practice over the last 10 years, and probably have HUGE divisions devoted to the analysis, development, testing, and deployment of patches.
:)
I was thinking that Microsoft is the quickest because they don't fix it correctly and they have to issue patch after patch until they (hopefully) finally correct it at some point in time.
Then again, Sun is a mess for whatever reason. Somehow, I'd hope that they'd be consistent in keeping the code clean since they built their business to keep other people's data safe and healthy.






Member since:
2006-01-26
I know this is pretty much flamebait...
Maybe Microsoft is so fast because they have had tons of practice over the last 10 years, and probably have HUGE divisions devoted to the analysis, development, testing, and deployment of patches.
:)