Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Apr 2008 20:12 UTC, submitted by Craig Barth
Microsoft "What Intel giveth, Microsoft taketh away. Such has been the conventional wisdom surrounding the Windows/Intel (aka Wintel) duopoly since the early days of Windows 95. In practical terms, it means that performance advancements on the hardware side are quickly consumed by the ever-increasing complexity of the Windows/Office code base. Case in point: Microsoft Office 2007, which, when deployed on Windows Vista, consumes more than 12 times as much memory and nearly three times as much processing power as the version that graced PCs just seven short years ago, Office 2000. Despite years of real-world experience with both sides of the duopoly, few organizations have taken the time to directly quantify what my colleagues and I at Intel used to call The Great Moore's Law Compensator (TGMLC). In fact, the hard numbers above represent what is perhaps the first-ever attempt to accurately measure the evolution of the Windows/Office platform in terms of real-world hardware system requirements and resource consumption. In this article I hope to further quantify the impact of TGMLC and to track its effects across four distinct generations of Microsoft's desktop computing software stack."
Thread beginning with comment 309777
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: End the bload
by mmu_man on Tue 15th Apr 2008 23:39 UTC in reply to "RE: End the bload"
mmu_man
Member since:
2006-09-30

It still runs (Zeta 1.2) perfectly on my laptop, much faster than XP to boot, and I didn't need to add 512M of RAM unlike for installing Ubuntu.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: End the bload
by sbergman27 on Wed 16th Apr 2008 01:19 in reply to "RE[2]: End the bload"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

[qand I didn't need to add 512M of RAM unlike for installing Ubuntu. [/q]
Ubuntu 7.10 installs and runs nicely in 256MB. 512MB is noticeably faster. But 256MB is quite adequate.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[4]: End the bload
by bryanv on Wed 16th Apr 2008 15:38 in reply to "RE[3]: End the bload"
bryanv Member since:
2005-08-26

You're kidding me, right?

I get -horrendous- performance out of Ubuntu 7.10 on my dual P3 1gzh, 512MB, plenty o' disk on UWSCSI box at home. Oh, with GeForce FX5200, compiz enabled.

If I disable compiz, I can -watch- the windows draw. Enabling compositing at least delays the update until the offscreen buffer is drawn to then does a quick blit operation. There's still a lot of lag, but at least it's a fixed amount of lag and I don't have to watch dirty regions on the screen redraw.

BeOS and Haiku on that box both perform better. Go figure.

Heck, WinXP runs better.

I'm an avid OS junkie, but the claims that Linux (especially Ubuntu) is happy as a clam on old hardware are bunk. I'd rather have my old 400mhz G4 with Panther back than have to run Ubuntu on my dual 1ghz box.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: End the bload
by mmu_man on Wed 16th Apr 2008 16:51 in reply to "RE[3]: End the bload"
mmu_man Member since:
2006-09-30

But 256MB is quite adequate.

256MB maybe, but not 192MB.
I had to use the alternate CD and it was slow even without the useless 3D effects.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2