Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Apr 2008 21:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 310103
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Low cost PCs?
by Earl Colby pottinger on Fri 18th Apr 2008 02:30
in reply to "RE[2]: Low cost PCs?"




Member since:
2006-09-01
I would argue that Windows isn't suited for much of anything at its current price point. The simple fact of the matter is that Operating Systems, and even office productivity software, are commodities. They simply don't hold a value that is equal to what MS wants to charge for them. That's been Microsoft's entire problem with Vista. I'd actually pay $30 for Vista Ultimate, but certainly not $300 when Ubuntu can do just about everything Vista can for free (even gaming is getting better, thanks to wine).