OSNews > Thread > "RE[4]: Inserting Module in Kernel to Set Peripherals ?" by helf

Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th Apr 2008 05:43 UTC, submitted by RJop

Linus Torvalds has released version 2.6.25 of the Linux kernel. "It's been long promised, but there it is now. Special thanks to Ingo who found and fixed a nasty-looking regression that turned out to not be a regression at all, but an old bug that just had not been triggering as reliably before."

9 · Read More · 36 Comment(s)

http://osne.ws/f5p

Thread beginning with comment 310131
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.

RE[4]: Inserting Module in Kernel to Set Peripherals ?

by helf on Thu 17th Apr 2008 18:51 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Inserting Module in Kernel to Set Peripherals ?"

Member since:
2005-07-06

Because people take you a lot less seriously when you do do that? Same as people here giving really good rebuttals to someone but ruining it by ending it with "idiot" or the like.

gah, moron. ;P

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[5]: Inserting Module in Kernel to Set Peripherals ?

by Temcat on Thu 17th Apr 2008 21:25 in reply to "RE[4]: Inserting Module in Kernel to Set Peripherals ?"

Member since:
2005-10-18

Because people take you a lot less seriously

Exactly. A person, not an argument. "Winblows" is lame and the one who uses it may be childish, but you don't refute an argument by pointing it out.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[6]: Inserting Module in Kernel to Set Peripherals ?

by helf on Thu 17th Apr 2008 21:26 in reply to "RE[5]: Inserting Module in Kernel to Set Peripherals ?"

Member since:
2005-07-06

fine, you win I suck at arguing. *sigh*

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2