Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Apr 2008 15:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 311479
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by puenktchen
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 25th Apr 2008 19:30
in reply to "Comment by puenktchen"
you can't speak of dutch "common law" - common law is the british case law and the derived law systems. iirc the dutch burgerlijk wetboek has been inspired by the napoleonic code civil which is heavily influenced by roman law.
The best translation I could find of burgerlijk recht (=civil law) was common law. Adding the adjective "Dutch" makes it clear it's not English Common Law I'm speaking of.
But yes, the term is troublesome.
RE[2]: Comment by puenktchen
by puenktchen on Sat 26th Apr 2008 18:13
in reply to "RE: Comment by puenktchen"




Member since:
2007-07-27
you can't speak of dutch "common law" - common law is the british case law and the derived law systems. iirc the dutch burgerlijk wetboek has been inspired by the napoleonic code civil which is heavily influenced by roman law.
psystar should move over to europe. i'm quite sure they'd be safe from apple's lawyers wrath in all member states of the european union because coupling two products together like this is illegal according to european competition and consumer laws.
ed: so the eula would even been illegal if the buyer signed it at the purchase.
Edited 2008-04-25 17:13 UTC