Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th May 2008 13:19 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
In July of 2007, Skype lost a court case over their failure to include a copy of the GPL in their WSKP100 VoIP phone - it ran Linux, GPL software, which means a copy of the GPL license must be included. The case was started by the gpl-violations.org group. Skype decided to appeal against the decision, but it has decided to withdraw that appeal.
Thread beginning with comment 313605
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by sahaqiel
by JoeBuck on Fri 9th May 2008 17:28
in reply to "RE: Comment by sahaqiel"
Member since:2006-01-11
But that doesn't work. If you succeed in getting the GPL declared invalid, and you ship GPL code, you're still screwed. Without the GPL, you have no agreement with the copyright holder that allows you to distribute or modify the code, so you still have to take your product off the market.
The judge in the case said that if an author demands that a publisher publish his work in a green envelope, then the publisher has to either use a green envelope, or not publish, and it doesn't matter whether it's a stupid condition.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-11-06
I think they wanted to declare /part/ of the license terms invalid, otherwise yeah, it would have been a very dumb move