Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th May 2008 17:40 UTC
Windows Last week, we reported on a peculiar price difference in Australia between the Linux and Windows versions of the Asus Eee PC 900, the new model in the Eee line. The Windows model was 50 USD cheaper than the Linux model - the Linux model did have a bigger hard drive, but interestingly, the version with the smaller hard drive was not available as a Linux machine. This gave rise to speculation that Microsoft had been putting pressure on Asus to favour Windows XP over Linux. It appears Microsoft's assault in this segment of the market goes deeper than just Asus and the Eee alone.
Thread beginning with comment 313858
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: "Assault?"
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 12th May 2008 17:52 UTC in reply to ""Assault?""
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

Also called "competition," and there's nothing wrong with it.


Is assault an inherently negative term or something?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: "Assault?"
by gonzo on Mon 12th May 2008 18:03 in reply to "RE: "Assault?""
gonzo Member since:
2005-11-10

I'd say so (especially in the context of the whole story - pressure on Asus, etc). But hey, correct me if I'm wrong.

Edited 2008-05-12 18:07 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: "Assault?"
by Morgan on Tue 13th May 2008 05:30 in reply to "RE: "Assault?""
Morgan Member since:
2005-06-29

Is assault an inherently negative term or something?


I can't think of a positive connotation. In law enforcement, my field of expertise, assault is most definitely a bad thing to do to someone, as it lands you a night or more in jail. Other uses of the word include acts of war, verbal harassment (verbal assault), intimidation tactics, and generally giving someone a bad day.

Yeah, I'd say it's a pretty negative concept.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3