Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd May 2008 20:54 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source More often than not, the question arises on OSNews why certain projects or pieces of abandonware aren't released as open source software. Supposedly, this would speed up development, facilitate the growth of a community, all that jazz associated with open source development. Here are four projects I'd like to see released under a MIT license.
Thread beginning with comment 315286
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Amiga OS 4
by Al2001 on Thu 22nd May 2008 21:42 UTC
Member since:

the latter might prove to be rather problematic since only three were built

I believe you mean three different models which incidently doesn't fit much better because it tells you nothing about the volume of sales of the units, which appears to be the point you are trying to get across.

I don't have any hard figures but I'll stick my neck out and say I'm pretty sure they sold more than three units of the A1 ;)

Reply Score: 3

RE: Amiga OS 4
by Thom_Holwerda on Thu 22nd May 2008 21:46 in reply to "Amiga OS 4"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:

I was being sarcastic.

I'm sure they sold 4.

Reply Parent Score: 15

RE[2]: Amiga OS 4
by Al2001 on Thu 22nd May 2008 22:09 in reply to "RE: Amiga OS 4"
Al2001 Member since:

Tom Said :
I was being sarcastic.

Dictionary Says :
1. mocking: characterized by words that mean the opposite of what they seem to say and are intended to mock or deride

So they actually sold -3 units?

I know this is getting silly ;) I never did figure how to admit defeat gracefully.

Reply Parent Score: 1