Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 15th Jun 2008 21:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 318604
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I have been hearing arguments like this before and I usually retort "then why use OpenSuse after all if you put that much effort in switching off all the Suse specific stuff?"
And no, at some point Yast is not a front-end that you just disable to get a common Linux environemnt. There are several configuration files and scripts that are very unique in their syntax and location.
That OpenSuse is regarded to be LSB compliant only shows how flawed the standardized LSB tests are.
Edited 2008-06-16 14:42 UTC







Member since:
2006-09-19
Novell did a lot to piss of the Suse crowd, including firing key personalities after taking over Suse in 2003. And while I think that layoffs and deep cuts were necessary it is also obvious that it was going downhill for the OpenSuse 'Community'. Also their press staff totally sucked at times. Talked with Novel/OpenSuse reps who didn't have basic knowledge about their product ("uh, yes - we have a product like that?!').
So it's good to see that Novell/OpenSuse tries to breathe new life into their distro. Hopefully they will make the necessary changes quick enough to survive in a niche market. OpenSuse 11-RC looks promising. Now they only need to make the transition from old Suse cruft* like YAST and SuseConfig to a sane Linux OS and they could get back in the game.
*I know, Yast and SuseConfig is great for first time desktop users. But apart from that it is not practicable since it strays too far from de-facto standard Linux environments.