Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Jun 2008 23:18 UTC
Mozilla & Gecko clones I've seen superlative after superlative concerning the release of Firefox 3.0, and in all honesty, it is making my stomach ache. Yes, Firefox 3.0 is a great release. It has a slicker interface (the UI on Vista looks quite pretty) and the use of native widgets in Linux is a very, very welcome addition. On top of that, it actually delivers what I was craving for the most from my favourite Windows web browser: much improved performance. But does Firefox 3.0 change the web, or alter the way we use the intertubes?
Thread beginning with comment 319488
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Does it make a revolition? Yes!
by ciplogic on Sat 21st Jun 2008 18:45 UTC
Member since:

I will think the basic software we have now and if it revolutionize:
- Windows XP
- Mac OS X
- Firefox 3

Windows XP brings the power of the NT kernel in the hands of desktop user. Automatically the user will have almost following advantages over Windows 98:
- stable UI, not freezing one
- faster in network traffic, high computing applications (one application that freeze taking all CPU in Windows 98 will make WinAmp to underperform)
- miss of a lot of restart scenarios (in the case of changing IP, installing programs, etc.)
- updated platform as a whole on matter of wizards, shell, internet explorer (6 at the moment), desktop theme
- rollback drivers and asks for certified drivers

Compared with Windows 98, anyway, it brings plenty of reasons to switch to XP but offers a not changed experience on matter of what it was: a double click Windows, a browser, with a DirectX and a Media Player.

OS X gives to user the same deep of changes in OS X, mainly:
- PDF based desktop
- Cocoa Objective-C framework
- Aqua user interface
- an improved desktop experience based on BSD foundation (Mach kernel)
- the dock

Did OS X makes a revolution on desktop? On matter of what it brings, excluding Aqua "theme", and the dock, OS X brings almost no revolution on desktop. (I think you get the irony)
It changed the experience of using a Mac, based on a single desktop interface (namely HIG), with better wizards and with a sluggish but polished 3D desktop (genie effect), gives instantly another feedback that users wants and expect.

Firefox 3 brings in the link you pointed out three parts:
- UI side of view: desktop integration, polishing ALL of the wizards, like Add-On page or Download page
- infrastructure side of view: tuned for performance (using PGO) as much as twice in javascript, better look (using cairo, but losing the Windows 9x and Mac OS compatibility), memory leaks (with memory cycle collector - a complete garbage collector)
- web experience point of view: - offers better support for web standards (it eventually pass Acid 2), parts of HTML5, new base for extensions, offline support
So, for me is similar with a major (revolutionary) desktop OS release.

Does you expect to not have a have different feeling on the address bar, like introducing Yes, someone cares of how you introduce that data in every deep detail, and right now you have a better way to do so. As you spell something wrong, an embedded dictionary will point you out, if you zoom a page, it will work. So, for me it changes how you use the web, much more based on the fact that Firefox has a third of web browser users that use it regularly.

Do you want a lot of changes to change how you render Yahoo Mail page? No, nothing can be done, as much as no browser can change the past web pages, as OS X or Windows XP cannot take an old application and instantly changes the MessageBox dialog (or any user feedback dialog) into a notification dialog. They have to take advantage of Firefox 3 and for sure will start web applications to start using FF3 support.

Great job Mozilla!

Reply Score: 2