Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 28th Jun 2008 22:09 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 320594
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Overstated conclusion
by sbergman27 on Sun 29th Jun 2008 18:15
in reply to "RE[4]: Overstated conclusion"
I thought his point was the 10baseX saturates quicker, given X being more bandwidth hungry, thus causing higher latency.
It takes a lot to saturate 10mbit. Watching a movie or playing software rendered Quake will do it. But browsing the web with Firefox/Cairo? Not even close. Many of my users started out on 10baseT some years back and the difference is not even detectable when doing normal business desktop things.
Yes, if what you are doing is inherently high bandwidth the extra bandwidth of 100baseT will help. Otherwise, latency is the determining factor.
Edited 2008-06-29 18:34 UTC




Member since:
2005-08-18
I thought his point was the 10baseX saturates quicker, given X being more bandwidth hungry, thus causing higher latency.