Linked by Tony Steidler-Dennison on Tue 15th Jul 2008 12:29 UTC, submitted by linuxlinks
Thread beginning with comment 322989
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So this type list is not your cup of tea. Personaly i have found this type of lists useful to me under some circumstances.
And you know you dont need to read every article on osnews the headline told pretty much wich kind of article this was, so you really did know beforehand that this was of no intreast for you.
Yeah shorter lists within a smaller area is also good especily when there are small reviews on every pice of software is also good, but it was not wath the author feelt like writing.
RE: why so much variety?
by Soulbender on Wed 16th Jul 2008 13:05
in reply to "why so much variety?"






Member since:
2007-06-12
i understand the need for variety when it comes to available applications, but why choose so many in a single 'review' or list of apps? and why 42?
this is the 2nd article i've seen like this lately, not sure if it was from OSNews but it probably was. this really isnt good reading content, i'd rather get a list of the 10 most amazing video apps or have them broken down into specific roles (like HTPC apps or something unique).
this link wasnt worth the click, i could of just googled for 'linux video apps' and gotten the same list.
also, reading the comments it seems everyone will jump in with 'oh they forgot this'... seems pretty pointless again.
Edited 2008-07-15 14:37 UTC