Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Sat 19th Jul 2008 19:01 UTC, submitted by cypress
Linux Linux and UNIX-like operating systems in general are regarded as being more secure for the common user, in contrast with operating systems that have "Windows" as part of their name. Why is that? When entering a dispute on the subject with a Windows user, the most common argument he tries to feed me is that Windows is more widespread, and therefore, more vulnerable. Apart from amusing myths like "Linux is only for servers" or "does it have a word processor?", the issue of Linux desktop security is still seriously misunderstood.
Thread beginning with comment 323750
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: the reason is simple
by netpython on Sun 20th Jul 2008 12:26 UTC in reply to "RE: the reason is simple"
Member since:

Social engineering, phishing scams, xss attacks and zero day browser vulnerabilities are not going away and thrive on the weakest link the user.

Reply Parent Score: 2