Linked by Tony Steidler-Dennison on Mon 28th Jul 2008 17:32 UTC, submitted by zaboing
Oracle and SUN In an interview with derStandard.at, Novell developer Michael Meeks talks mostly about Sun's lack of openness in regards to OpenOffice.org. He goes as far as stating that if Sun dropped out of OOo-development this "wouldn't be an entirely negative thing". He also goes on to talk about promoting Go-oo instead, and emphasizes the importance of breaking down the barriers between GNOME and KDE.
Thread beginning with comment 324838
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Not news
by kaiwai on Mon 28th Jul 2008 21:56 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Not news"
kaiwai
Member since:
2005-07-06

Sure, but the question is: is-it truly open when you use a license incompatible with the majority of open source software which are GPLv2?


Why should they go GPL. GPL is a proprietary licence in nature where by it can seem to suck in any code it wants but unless you project is GPL2, you can't take anything back from it. It is a one way process that it just as vile and disgusting as when proprietary vendors take BSD source code and don't provide patches or improvements back.

If you actually *TOOK* the time and read FSF, there is a bloody good reason why Stallman doesn't call software licensed under the GPL as 'open source'. May I suggest you actually *READ* some literature on the matter instead of spouting the usual pro-GPL jingoisms without the slightest understanding of the background.

I don't see anything wrong with the CDDL; the licence that IS out of step is the GPL2; where code sharing in the the GPL is a one way street, it is like a leech on the opensource community where rather than sharing code with other projects, it deliberately creates walls to stop enhancements made in BSD-like code imported into a GPL project from making its way back to the original BSD-like licensed project.

I know I'm going to lose points but damn it all, I am sick and tired of the same rhetoric being spewed by GPL/GNU/Linux fanboys whose only exposure to the opensource world is in the last 5 years, and still hold the idea that Microsoft created the PC revolution. The stench of stupidity in this forum some days is almost unbearable.

Edited 2008-07-28 21:59 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[6]: Not news
by chekr on Tue 29th Jul 2008 01:26 in reply to "RE[5]: Not news"
chekr Member since:
2005-11-05

+1 for you Matt.

While I wouldn't have put it in those words exactly I agree with your sentiments...

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Not news
by shapeshifter on Tue 29th Jul 2008 07:29 in reply to "RE[5]: Not news"
shapeshifter Member since:
2006-09-19

Did your Macbook overheat and kill the hard drive or something?
Foaming at the mouth will not fix it. Gotta take it to the Mac store and make a sacrifice to his holiness Steve J. (a few hundred dollars and a new iPod should do).
Lol

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Not news
by kaiwai on Tue 29th Jul 2008 19:50 in reply to "RE[6]: Not news"
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

Did your Macbook overheat and kill the hard drive or something?
Foaming at the mouth will not fix it. Gotta take it to the Mac store and make a sacrifice to his holiness Steve J. (a few hundred dollars and a new iPod should do).
Lol


What are you prattling on about? When it doubt - name call. Very nice. What next - going to name call Balmer instead of point out what is wrong with Windows? oops, that's right! when you actually DO write something of substance on this forum you find that some numbskull moderates your post down.

Reply Parent Score: 2