Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Wed 20th Aug 2008 17:13 UTC, submitted by Vito Melecka
Thread beginning with comment 327463
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Mulit vs single threaded
by frantisheq on Wed 20th Aug 2008 19:34
in reply to "RE[2]: Mulit vs single threaded"
lucky you but i expected new computer to run faster that's why i bought it. thx god for hackintosh.
ok enough because this will end up as flaming no matter how i try to avoid it
PS: i'm also on XP, *Linux, FreeBSD, Mac OS and no problems with speed, no HDD doing something all the time, no full 2G memory. tried server 2008 as desktop os and i have to say i like it more compared to vista
sorry for my english
Edited 2008-08-20 19:38 UTC
RE[4]: Mulit vs single threaded
by modmans2ndcoming on Wed 20th Aug 2008 23:20
in reply to "RE[3]: Mulit vs single threaded"






Member since:
2006-07-24
Something is seriously wrong with your P.C.
I use Linux/*BSD/*Solaris/Windows and yes even vista and I dont see it running slow.