Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Aug 2008 22:13 UTC, submitted by rom508
Thread beginning with comment 328322
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: No Room in the Workstation Market for non-x86
by StephenBeDoper on Thu 28th Aug 2008 23:12
in reply to "RE: No Room in the Workstation Market for non-x86"
RE[3]: No Room in the Workstation Market for non-x86
by Wes Felter on Fri 29th Aug 2008 00:00
in reply to "RE[2]: No Room in the Workstation Market for non-x86"
I've seen this argument for years: "SPARC is slower but it has more throughput", "SPARC has better I/O", etc. I'm still waiting to see a benchmark, any benchmark, that can make an ancient SPARC machine look faster than a recent x86.
Also, I don't recommend commuting in a tractor.
RE[2]: No Room in the Workstation Market for non-x86
by wigginz on Fri 29th Aug 2008 21:24
in reply to "RE: No Room in the Workstation Market for non-x86"







Member since:
2005-11-15
A power-sucking machine that's slower than a Celeron is great for a hobbyist on a budget?