Linked by David Adams on Wed 10th Sep 2008 15:43 UTC, submitted by Michael Larabel
Thread beginning with comment 329965
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Xorg 7.4 comes with a whimper...
by cyclops on Wed 10th Sep 2008 21:08
in reply to "RE[6]: Xorg 7.4 comes with a whimper..."
RE[8]: Xorg 7.4 comes with a whimper...
by sbergman27 on Wed 10th Sep 2008 21:18
in reply to "RE[7]: Xorg 7.4 comes with a whimper..."
RE[7]: Xorg 7.4 comes with a whimper...
by PlatformAgnostic on Wed 10th Sep 2008 22:37
in reply to "RE[6]: Xorg 7.4 comes with a whimper..."
RE[8]: Xorg 7.4 comes with a whimper...
by cyclops on Wed 10th Sep 2008 23:12
in reply to "RE[7]: Xorg 7.4 comes with a whimper..."





Member since:
2005-07-24
Yes. It's out but it's quite broken. The X server segfaults with a backtrace going into even 2D.
(Irrelevant drivel trimmed.)
Whether it is memory management or not, it immediately segfaults.
1. It's a desktop.
2. It's my desktop.
3. I've semi-retired. Not that my old employer ever would have bought anyone a laptop.
The marketing hype is actually 300% as fast as 3100.
I Just left this quote in to highlight what a skilled debater you are, Cyclops. Not your best work, though. I thought your "slimy little toady" post was quite outstanding:
http://www.osnews.com/thread?272915
Anyway, like I say, the Intel FOSS driver segfaults immediately when X first starts, and my Nvidia with the proprietary drivers performs perfectly. It's the FOSS driver holding the distro release back and not NVidia's driver.
Yeah, right. I'll work on my "hating". Surely Cyclops harbors none in his heart. :-0
Edited 2008-09-10 21:00 UTC