Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Sun 21st Sep 2008 06:46 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 330938
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The second linked article is a survey by the Linux Foundation. It also includes a graphic about where the kernel contributors come from: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/publications/images/table4-companies...
There are even some companies on the list, I've never heard from before, like Linutronix. Cannonical/Ubuntu is not on the list.
I don't know if the Linux Foundation is nowadays a competitor to Cannonical, but I don't think they are. ;-)





Member since:
2005-07-06
What a surprise. Someone points to a serious problem of Canonical/Ubuntu, which has been noticed by a a lot of developers from many projects, including X.org, gcc and, the kernel, and instead of acknowledging the problem the best they can do is to try to stir up the zealots and the nutjobs (like schestowitz of boycottnovel.com fame) with this "he works for novell!!! he is an enemy of the people!!!" crap.
If he attacked Canonical because he works for Novell, how comes that he repeatedly pointed up that RED HAT contributes many thing to everything? Canonical contributes less than Gentoo, a free community distro without a single payed developer...
Edited 2008-09-21 11:10 UTC